FIABILITÉ.AUTO

Barometers & Studies

FR

The 2025 Barometer of Car Reliability in France

Published 18 August 2026 · 6 min read

Wheel alignment check on a Ford Focus 3, on a workshop lift.
Photo: Mike Peel — CC BY-SA 4.0

Every year, millions of roadworthiness tests (the French contrôle technique — broadly equivalent to the UK’s MOT) are carried out across France. This data, published by UTAC-OTC, says something precise about how vehicles actually hold up over time — provided you know how to read it correctly. Here’s what the 2025 edition reveals.

The key figures

  • 530 models tracked, covering 96.2% of the real national testing volume.
  • 38 brands represented, from single-model niche manufacturers to mass-market volume.
  • 18.94%: the average retest rate recorded this year, across all models.

This isn’t an abstract percentage: it’s the share of vehicles that, once presented for testing, have to come back for a second visit after repairs. The lower this rate for a given model, the better that model holds up, over time, on the points actually checked (braking, suspension & steering, emissions, lighting).

The 2025 podium

Three models stand well clear of the rest of the fleet:

  1. Škoda Fabia I — 1.32% retest rate
  2. Toyota Yaris I — 2%
  3. Mercedes M-Class I — 2.2%

At the other end of the table, two models stand out for the wrong reasons:

  • Fiat Punto II — 43.71%
  • Alfa Romeo 159 / Brera / Spider III — 42.73%

The gap between the top and bottom of this ranking is considerable: more than 42 percentage points separate the Škoda Fabia I from the Fiat Punto II.

Brand rankings: beware of samples that are too small

The ranking of the 38 brands is more of a lesson in methodology than a scoop. At the top of the raw table: Alpine (6.99%), Chrysler (8.2%), Cupra (10.58%). Impressive figures — but each one rests on a single tracked model. A sample size of one doesn’t support any serious generalisation about a whole brand’s reliability.

Excluding brands with too small a sample (fewer than 5 models tracked), the podium changes completely:

  1. Mazda — 13.81% (11 models tracked)
  2. Hyundai — 14.86% (17 models)
  3. Land Rover — 16.76% (8 models)

Conversely, looking at high-volume brands (more than 25 models tracked, so the most representative of the real fleet):

Brand Average rate Models tracked
Audi 17.76% 27
Mercedes 18.48% 32
BMW 18.55% 32
Citroën 19.16% 38
Toyota 20.92% 28
Ford 23.17% 28
Volkswagen 23.44% 32
Renault 24.91% 40
Peugeot 25.55% 36
Opel 26.42% 25

This is the table that actually makes statistical sense — not the raw ranking topped by brands with a single model.

What this barometer doesn’t tell you

The roadworthiness test assesses safety (braking, suspension & steering, emissions, lighting), not a vehicle’s overall mechanical reliability (internal engine wear, clutch, gearbox). A low retest rate signals good durability on the points actually checked — a solid statistical signal, but a partial one. The full methodology, its limitations, and how it compares with the UK and Dutch data also available on this site, are explained on the methodology page (in French).

See the full detail

The full ranking of all 530 models, filterable by category and brand, is available on the rankings page (in French). To compare two models side by side, the comparison tool (in French) shows retest rate, national rank and supporting data at a glance.

Source data: UTAC-OTC, French roadworthiness test (contrôle technique), 2025. Full methodology available here (in French).